Friday, October 30, 2009

"Marketing Tips for Social Media"

Listen in as Tamar Weinberg gives viewers some tips on using social media in your marketing efforts. There are a few sites she states that everyone should be using. Find out which ones they are,and more in this interview with

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

"Google Launches Social Search"

Google's latest experiment was launched the other day "Social Search". Basically, it allows you to find content by people in what they call your "social circle". This consists of your Gmail contacts, Twitter, Friendfeed friends and more. These search results will appear beneath the normal search results. For more see....

Monday, October 26, 2009

"Google Steals the Web"

Another hot topic that has everyone talking online is Google's new Sidewiki. It's an add on for Google's Toolbar that basically allows anyone to leave comments on websites they visit. It has a lot of people up in arms. What happens if people leave negative comments on your website? What will that do to your hard earned reputation? Good or bad Google is continually bringing new products and services to enhance your use of the  Internet. Some people like them, some don't. As my Mama use to say "You can please some of the people, some of the time....."

Hop over to Jim Edward's Blog and get his opinion on Google's latest invention. Then leave your comments here. What do you think?

Saturday, October 17, 2009

“The origin of Twitter”

(Guest article)

The Twitter venture first started in 2006 and has its head office in the San Francisco BayTwitter bird area. What was essentially seen as a fun challenge for the staff of private business soon grew into one of most utilized social messaging services all over America and soon spreading the world over.

Many twitter members choose to use the social media site to read up to date tweets about breaking news or see what their contacts are doing. The concept began when its creator Jack Dorsey took an interest in the search for all the daily actions of his mates. He saw an opportunity in the simple concept, he had envisioned and was quick to discuss it with his workplace buddies. The potential was clearly visible to all so they sought to try and develop a proto-type of this system.

The early history of twitter was due to the complex amalgamation of a few internet companies including the organization, 'Odea' which later turned in 'Obvious Corp' which helped bankroll the investment required for the initial Twitter project. In March 2006, the twitter prototype was operational after only two weeks of development. But it was not until August in 2006, when Twitter was first released online for use by the public. Later, as the service started to gain recognition, the people behind its creation separated again from the original Obvious name to form a stand alone company named Twitter Inc.

Other private web development organizations who were also trying to provide similar short message applications were left quizzing how Twitter grew into such a massive success. I guess the answer to that question was quite obvious at time when web savvy audiences were looking to technology to provide a way for people to keep connection with any person in any locality. Twitter allows messages from the net, SMS, instant messaging, mobile phone, internet and other application programming interfaces (API) and all this array of features were appealing to different people short on spare time.

The massive amount of information transfer from more traditionally means of communication on the web could be seen as providing oversupply of stimulus that was difficult for the human mind to cope with. With Twitter this problem was resolved because it gave each user more control of how, what and when to communicate. After a tweet message is published, an reply straight away is not expected by the sender. News and alerts from your friends, loved-ones and family are sent to your own site, instant messaging, or cell but the user has the choice of when they read that information in which they can reply to the tweets or simply ignore it all together. The information that you receive on Twitter can be set up and changed from your own unique account profile.

"Ruby on Rails (RoR)” is the programming code framework used to make Twitter run. Daily, many code level changes are made to keep improving the application easily and new add-on options are released quickly with no bugs. Their large team of specialist software programmers and networking engineers always use Macintosh computer hardware with the only exception being in the initial testing phase. The twitter graphic user interface (GUI) on their site was designed using the 'Photoshop' and 'Omni graffle' programs. Twitters creators continue to reinvest resources into further development and providing excellent service to the millions of members from all over the globe.

Twitter still puts a big priority on the behavior of their users and any new suggestions they receive. In May 2007 twitter decided to launch the mobile interface version after getting a high number of requests from its users. Despite the rapid rise and spectacular fame achieved by Twitter Inc. they still stay true to their original operating ethos – keeping all things intuitive & simple.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Update to Marlon Sander's Original Post on FTC Updates

I posted an article by Marlon Sanders the other day (Read it here)  on the new changes for affiliates and bloggers per the FTC. Since that posting he has made a few updates which I'm posting below.

By Marlon Sanders

I got a ton of replies on my blog to the weekend ezine. However, I DO need to pass on a few corrections. And if you sent out my ezine or posted it, if you could add these corrections to where that post is or inform your folks, it'd be good.

1. Link to the actual FTC stuff:

2. I'll repeat. I'm NOT a lawyer. There ARE a few attorneys doing webinars on this stuff. Go to and you can probably find one.

3. One inaccuracy I made is on average vs. typical or generally expected results. A friend called to tell me that average results aren't the same as typical or generally expected results.

4. The new guidelines applies to endorsements and testimonials.As I read it (but I'm not 100% sure of it) the same laws or guidelines DO apply to the REST of your ad.

5. You CANNOT use a claim at ALL if you don't have proof it's a typical or generally expected result.

That's also the one I find problematic. Like if Bill Walsh wrote a book on how to win the superbowl, the typical result of reading the book is NOT winning a Superbowl. So he can't call the book or ebook that nor use it as a headline in an ad? That's a question I'll probably ask Bob Silbir, who IS an attorney with a ton of Internet experience.

I'm SURE you will see many more things come out on how to comply with this as people adjust and react to it.

I'll be going through forty million web pages trying to take 'em down or clean 'em up before Dec. 1 or whenever it is this goes into

NOW -- My advice is to put on your best Marketing Ninja outfit,take dance lessons, call Bob Silbur if you got your assets on the line and do your best to comply.

Back to what I do BEST compared to talking about sticky and thorny legal issues.

Marlon Sanders

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

"How to Improve Website Credibility Part 2"

"Learn how to create a site that will improve your capture leads, turn visitors into customers and increase your sales." Watch the video then leave your comments.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
How to Improve Website Credibility Part 2

Saturday, October 10, 2009

"Should you Freak Out Over the New FTC Guidelines?"

I’m sure you’ve been reading about the new FTC guidelines for bloggers and affiliate marketers. If not, you must be living under a rock. It’s everywhere. I ran across this article written by Marlonmerle2_good Sanders, which sums it all up with his usual sense of humor. I loved it an thought you might too.

Here is Marlon’s views on the new guidelines:
Let's talk about the latest FTC guidelines and how you should respond? You're going to be seeing lots of web sites and ads that say "The average person made .01 cents," or $1.00 or other such ridiculous numbers. Let's talk about WHY this is and what you should understand about it.  There's a bit of sane thinking in this ezine, or I think there is. So you might wanna read it.

The FTC published new guidelines about income claims and affiliate links.  Here's a great link to an interview about it from Fast Company:

Since I ain't no lawyer, you better learn about this stuff yourself.  But let me give you a marketer's perspective. I in NO WAY am criticizing the law. I'm just stating a marketer's viewpoint and explaining things you're doing to see happen on marketer's web pages, so you understand WHY you're going to see these things. A lot of what I say below is intentionally MELODRAMATIC
and tongue in cheek. But there is a real law and real penalties.  So understand that while I'm making a bit of light of it, there IS a real point here you need to take seriously.

Let's drill down.

1.  Typicality of results If you use testimonials or endorsements that make a specific claim, you ALSO have to reveal the results the average user gets. So if you read in one of my letters and endorsement or testimonial that says Johnny or Betty used one of my products and paid for a new house with it, you'll ALSO be seeing a disclaimer that says: "The average person who bought this product made .01 cents." I may be exaggerating but that is roughly what you'll be reading quite a bit.

Now, you and I BOTH know (or you should know) that the average person buys stuff and doesn't do a lot with it.  Or if you don't know that or haven't heard it, it is the truth. Then again, the average person reads two books a year, can't spell the word Potato, thinks UFO's exist, and doesn't vote in elections.

So unless YOU are average, this shouldn't be of great concern to you.  Now granted, I had to look up the spelling of potato in Wikipedia. But at LEAST I'm bright enough to do that. A lot of people aren't. HOWEVER -- having said that, about three weeks ago, I published an article FORESEEING what has gone down. I published an article that said basically 95% of people don't do squat at Internet marketing. That statement a few disillusioned souls to refund to my office.

Absolutely phenomenal.So let me break this down for you again at the risk of having other pie-in-sky dreamers freak out over it. Here's what you're going to see: Marketers WILL have statements in their sales materials  that reveal the average results are PATHETIC. Does THAT mean the methods don't work? Heck no. What it means is people don't work the methods. I speak the truth. a.  Very few people read more than five chapters of those books, ebooks and courses they buy.  I know this because I've put tracking links in products and I can tell how deep people read into the product.

So HOW pray tell are the average results going to be good when, on average, NO ONE even READS the product? Should the fact that you're competing against people who can't and don't read ALARM you?  Or should it KINDA make you excited to know that you're competing against people who buy stuff and never even read it?

b.  Out of the people who DO read, there are many reasons people buy products. A LOT of people, maybe even the majority, buy out of curiosity or to do research. They don't INTEND on acting on the information. I do this ALL the time. I'm a curious person.  I buy stuff all the time out of curiosity  with zero intention of doing anything with it.Does that INVALIDATE the information I'm reading and mean it doesn't work because a whole lot of people are just like me and reading for enjoyment, research or curiosity?

c.  Do you really believe you're an average person? Personally, I don't like the attitude that everything should be boiled down to the lowest common denominator and we should protect people who can't read, can't spell (or at LEAST look it up in Wikipedia) and believe stupid stuff like they can push a button and buy a yacht the next week. One way or the other, evolution will eventually weed those people out.  Just not in OUR lifetime. I like to think that God don't make junk and that I got a little something going for me. And I would hope you do also.

d.  Decreased competition is GOOD. This law will weed out some competitors who just don't want to reveal that the people who buy their deal on average don't do squat. This is good. It's the law of supply and demand.  Less supply means more of the pie for the rest of us.  Seriously, this law isn't the end of the world.

I've complied with MOST of it all my career or done my best to.Much or most of this law has been in place for a long time.  People are just now realizing what the law says. My take is, you don't freak out. You just comply.  Ain't no big thang. But when you see some disclaimers that sound outlandish, you DO need to understand WHY they are there and the purpose and intent of them to protect new, uninformed people from making bad decisions.I HAVE seen people who ARE sincere believe extreme hype and spend money they didn't have. Law one:  Do NOT spend money you don't have to chase an uncertain result.  Scared money never wins.  You build a business with money you can afford to lose.

Law two: There is no simple, easy, no-brainer thing you can do that will bring you in 6 g's a month.  Everything in business requires a brain and thinking. Law three: People who are an overnight success were either lucky, inordinately talented or spent a long time preparing for that big moment of success.Law three:  There is no magic ebook or course you can buy that in 30 days or even 60 is going to allow you to pay off those huge credit card bills or buy you a Lambo.  So stop asking for it and  looking for it. You GROW a business over time, not overnight.  Relationships with customers take some time to build.  And some people like my friends Lee McIntyre and Jason Fladlien DO extremely well really fast. But yeah, that ain't average. It took me a lot longer.

Is This A Hidden Flaw In The Law?

Now, lest you think this is all rosy, there IS a hidden flaw in the law.Here it is:

What the law SHOULD say is that you have to publish the average results of people who reasonably followed what you taught. This does NOT mean you skirt the law. I'm just saying here is why I think it's misguided.  Now, I'm NOT blaming the FTC on this.
They are trying to protect people.

I understand that and it's a noble cause. They have the right to make and enforce the law and it's our job to comply fully and completely.
But let me give you an example from a marketer's perspective:

The AVERAGE person who buys a beginner's book on how to play the guitar WON'T ever play more than maybe one chord. They read chapter one, and go back to playing video games, eating bon bons on the sofa or reading the National Enquirer. I'm NOT making this up.  This is actually true.  But what's wrong with that?  I have all kinds of books on all kinds of topics I bought for one reason or the other and never did anything with. Like this book over here on my bookshelf on how to design a database.  Like I ever read that!  I mean, it sounded like a good idea at the time!I doubt I made it through one chapter.  No big deal.  And on rare occasion I eat bon bons and read the National Enquirer. So there you go.

Here's what the law SHOULD say through the eyes of a marketer:

What is the average result by the person who actually follows the majority, if not all, of the instructions? Of course, there are so few of those people, it wouldn't make for a very good law. That would expose how ridiculous it is. For example, how many people READ the Bible cover-to-cover or even the New Testament? How about even one whole chapter? And how many of those people can even QUOTE what the 10 commandments are not to mention even take a stab at following them? Case proved.

The obvious example here is the people who buy something off of a TV commercial that helps them drop 10 pounds. Whatever "it" is comes with a little manual that says in addition to using whatever the tool is, you ALSO have to STOP stuffing your pretty little face with pizza, beer, tacos, nachos, pie, cake and  candy, not to mention those piggie blanket things down at the mall I like to chow down on.
Of course, about .00001% of the people actually do that. So we all KNOW what the average results are.   Does that mean whatever was sold doesn't work? It's like Jared on those Subway commercials.  By the way, I think Subway is a trademark.  I probably am supposed to say that. Can you imagine the commercials when they say THIS?

"While Jared dumbped 108 pounds, (or however many it was) the average Subway customer actually GAINS 25 pounds in a period of 5 years because in addition to  eating subs, they ALSO on average consume 512 pizzas, 398 bottles  of beer, 498 pieces of candy, 109 servings of cake or pie and 598 bon bons, not to mention soft drinks  and other assorted goodies." Americans, on average, are considerably overweight.  Eating at Subway ain't gonna change that as long people continue to pig down on other stuff.  Is THAT Subway's fault? So I ate at Subway this week.  I also bought a full pumpkin pie and chowed down on it (albeit a little guiltily).  I had some pizza and ice cream. So on net I think I gained 1 or 2 pounds this week.  None of that is Subway's fault.  By the way, this example if HYPOTHETICAL. Maybe Subway customers lose tons.  I don't know.  It's an example or illustration that's pure fantasy in my head and NOT representative of true, real Subway customers.

Here's my POINT:

Isn't the real question what happens in that rare event when  someone actually FOLLOWS instructions? I think that my results would look pretty decent if you looked at what happens when people act on what I teach.  Like on my Dashboards.  For the people who actually go through all the steps on an icon, I imagine most people get a good result on that ICON.  Thing is,  they don't go through all the icons. And that's the fly in the ointment as far as average results are concerned.

Here's an Example
About 3 weeks ago I published a drop dead ezine issue with extreme specifics on how to do an outline in freemind and record it using software that also is gratus. Out of roughly 50,000 people who got my ezine issue, THREE PEOPLE did anything with it. THREE. What percentage is that? My math is crap (cause I'm "average" at math). But I think that is  .006% average results. If you're one of those 3 people, congratulations. You're the anomaly. The weird, rare person with an ounce of entrepreneurial ability and instinct and the capacity to take action.

People worry about competition. Look at it this way.  For every 50,000 potential competitors, about 3 of them will ever do jack. This is what average is. If you're one of the other 49,997 who didn't do jack, it's OK. You're AVERAGE!  It's normal to not do anything. It's OK that you read my ezines for either inspiration, or for ideas, or for use in the future. A lot of people read this ezine just in case they DO decide to do something in the future.  It's all good. Nothing wrong with that. Fact is, I'd say that's most people. I do the SAME exact thing. I subscribe to, buy and store information of all sorts from all kinds of resources.

An Example From My Family

A long time ago when my dad who is 80+ now was a young buck, he took a correspondence course to learn how to fix Television sets, which were the hot new technology on the block. I'm assuming the company sold a lot of those 3-year correspondence courses.
My dad finished the course and they flew him in at their expense to a graduation with two other people That's right.  Two others finished the course that year!  Three total. My dad went on to do very well in the TV service business and at one point serviced the TV sets for virtually every hotel and motel in in the city we grew up. And that was his part time job.

The correspondence course was a GREAT course.  It worked.  It allowed my dad to accumulate substantial assets and support my family over the course of his lifetime. Yet the average person who took that course NEVER made even one DIME because they never FINISHED it.  That's the fly in the ointment with this law.

You know that book "How to Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie? On AVERAGE I dare say people who buy that book do NOT Win Friends or Influence people.  Why?  Because it says stuff like you have to smile  at people and consider their point of view and listen. How many people who buy that book REALLY do it?  Seriously.  How many people do you know who listen, always consider the other person's  point of view and who do all the other stuff the book teaches?  Not me!  That's for sure.  And probably hardly anyone I know.  Ain't Dale Carnegie's fault I like to talk more than I listen,  criticize others, and consider my own point of view first. 

2.  Revealing affiliate links  This one is more vague.  But the FTC says that, more or less, you  need to be transparent about this relationship.  No problemo. You tell people it's an affiliate link or you make a commission.  Whatever. I don't think this amounts to diddly squat.  Just do it. Here's my affiliate link:  blah, blah, blah.  Or:  Affiliate link:  blah, blah, blah.

Ain't no big thang.  I'm not sure exactly how you have to reveal them or what's required.  I BELIEVE you just have to state that they're  affiliate links. That's how I read the law. "OMG!  I clicked a link, bought and someone snagged a few bux in their bank account because of it.  The world is coming to an end!" Personally, I make an ATTEMPT to buy via affiliate links because I want to SUPPORT the people who give me ideas and turn me onto cool stuff.   But maybe that's just me. I reckon lots of average folks out there believe that the people who take time to write elaborate reviews on blogs with nice graphic design and perty pictures 'n stuff are just altruistic human beings and doing it without making one penny if they click their little link their, whip out their credit card and punch in the numbers.
So in the spirit of full disclosure, get this NOW!  ALL links to ANY product in my ezines or products  that are NOT my own ARE affiliate links. That means, if you click and pull out your credit card and enter those little numbers on it and push SUBMIT that money is going to appear in my bank account.

If you have a problem with that, then do NOT enter your credit card numbers now, quickly and easily and do NOT push submit.  Not NOW. Please. Thank you very much. If you have been deceived into thinking I'm a charity and I do this out of the goodness of my human heart just because I ain't got nothing else to do with my time, then let me clarify this for you right this second. You click.  You buy.  I profit. How 'bout them bananas?

The Final Disclaimer

In the words of Frank freaking Kern, I ain't a lawyer nor do I play one on TV. That means you're well advised to go read the little law yourself, consult your own legal advice, and, in general, use that little thingy God put in your head called a BRAIN. Now that's a pretty novel concept for a lot of us, myself included. And I DO expect that at least 3 people who read this ezine will do  it. Still, I gotta say that just cause I'm supposed to and it makes me sleep better at night.

What You DO Need To Do

As I read the law, here's the scoop:

1. If you publish testimonials or endorsements that aren't typical of average results, you need to reveal what those average results actually are, as pathetic and pitiful as they probably are or will be.

2. If you make claims or promises in your letter, as anyone selling anything does if they hope to make any sale before Christmas, then you need to state what the average results.  I'm not certain the law requires this but I believe it does. Again, you and I both know that in ANY how to product, the average  results will be absolutely pathetic.  Just embarrasing.  So live  with it.

Comply with the law.  There is no choice about this. Personally, I'll probably state that my average earnings from my  buyers are .01 each unless I can get provable stats that show otherwise. Since thousands of my email addresses from thousands of customers in dozens of countries are no longer valid, getting stats OTHER than that won't be easy. So when you see those average earnings from myself and other marketers, understand why they are there and what they MEAN. Oh, if I send you a survey about this, please take it and return

You can also publish testimonials that are fluffy without specific results.  Like "OMG, Marlon is so smart!" Personally, I like to print out and read those testimonials anyway. I try to get other people to let me read them to them but you know...that doesn't go down so well.

3.  Consider publishing a separate web page for non-U.S. customers I'm NOT sure about this one yet.  But I THINK you will legally be able to serve up a different page to non-U.S. customers.

4.  If you use affiliate links, reveal they're an affiliate link. Like honestly, who except the rawest newbie doesn't know this in our industry. So revealing it won't make a dime's worth of difference in your sales. This is NOT the end of the world. People will STILL buy from you if they are educated about the law in the U.S. Average results suck but hopefully YOU aren't average. And if you are, join the crowd.

Oh, and read the law yourself since I ain't no lawyer nor attorney. I'm just an online marketer who likes to sell stuff. I may be wrong as the day is long on all aspects of this law and my opinions. So use your noodle to get the boodle and do a bit of your own sound thinking and research.

By Marlon Sanders

The King of Step-By-Step Internet Marketing and "The Ambassador of Old School Marketing"

P.S. In the spirit of complete compliance, here is my new disclaimer:

Ain't NONE of the results in NONE of the web pages below anything remotely resembling AVERAGE nor typical." People who succeed at stuff possess superhuman, freakish ability and you should NOT assume you fall in that elite class of superhumans.  You' ain't never gonna amount to nothing so just give it up.  That's my disclaimer.  My average buyer earns .01.  And if you work really hard, read well and follow all the instructions you too can end up in this elite class.
Marlon Sanders is the author of "The Amazing Formula That
Sells Products Like Crazy for approximately .00001% of the
people who buy the product and the KING of Step-By-Step
Internet Marketing for those 3 people out of 50,000 who
can actually follow steps.  Everybody else is basically screwed
with no hope of being anything but average -- EVER!"
You can COMMENT on this article here:

To get on his killer ezine list, to get cheat sheets and all kinds
of other goodies every Saturday and during the week, to get simple,
to-the-point Internet marketing know that works real world without
all the hype, go to:
and subscribe

Check out all my products here: (this is my affiliate link)

Marlon posted an update to this rant a few days later. You can read part 2 of that post here:

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

"Will Google ever Provide Statistics on Browser Market Share?"

Will Google ever provide statistics on browser market share? Listen in as Matt Cutts tackles this tough question.